9/8/2023 0 Comments Sqlpro finished with error![]() ![]() Then we grant the system privilege SELECT ANY TABLE to the role RESOURCE. Here is a case that can reproduce the error. Some privileges inherit from role do not work in some situation, especially when accessing intermediate kinds of object, like views or store procedures. That's why this section is little longer. If the user still got ORA-01031 after granting CREATE VIEW to him, it must be a deeper problem. If you have read the above section, then you have known that you have to grant CREATE VIEW to the user in order to solve ORA-01031. SQL> create index customer_id_gen_idx on sh.customers (cust_id, cust_gender) Įven though the case is possible in reality, we seldom create index for other user's table in our schema. SQL> grant index on sh.customers to thomas This is because SELECT on that table is not enough, you should additionally grant INDEX on that table to user, which is an object privilege. ORA-01031: insufficient privileges Solution to ORA-01031 SQL> create index customer_id_gen_idx on sh.customers (cust_id, cust_gender) Ĭreate index oe.customer_id_gen_idx on sh.customers (cust_id, cust_gender) Then it tries to create an index on that table. SQL> grant select on sh.customers to thomas Suppose the new user wants to create an index for SH.CUSTOMERS in his own schema, so we grant SELECT on that table (object privilege) by instinct. Let's see an example and then we guess what privilege we need. Please note that, CREATE INDEX is not a valid privilege, but CREATE ANY INDEX is. In the above section, we have granted CREATE TABLE to the new user, which naturally enables it to CREATE INDEX in his own schema. If you use EXECUTE IMMEDIATE to run CREATE TABLE in a stored procedure, you may check ORA-01031 in EXECUTE IMMEDIATE section in this post. SQL> create table test1 (id number, e_id number) The solution is simple, just grant CREATE TABLE to user, a schema-based privilege or CREATE ANY TABLE, a system-wide privilege. Immediately, ORA-01031: insufficient privileges shows up, which tells the user who doesn't have the right privilege to do that. C:\Users\Administrator>sqlplus create table test1 (id number, e_id number) Ĭreate table test1 (id number, e_id number) Let's see what will happen if the new user wants to create a table. SQL> select distinct gender from oe.customers To solve insufficient privilege in querying, we should grant SELECT privilege to the user. ![]() OK, we can INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE, but no SELECT privilege. SQL> select privilege from dba_tab_privs where owner = 'OE' and table_name = 'CUSTOMERS' and grantee = 'HR' order by 1 So what object privileges we have now? Let's check them by a privileged user. Yes, we can see its metadata, but not data. The first test is that, can we describe the table's definition? SQL> desc oe.customers But the error message indicates us that we don't use the right privilege to do it. Theoretically, if we can't see other's table, we got ORA-00942: table or view does not exist. Tried to select other's table, we got ORA-01031: insufficient privileges. You may click whichever situation you encountered. There're several error patterns of ORA-01031 in this post. So I do my best to collect cases for you. ![]() Since this error can be seen almost in every kind of SQL statement, sometimes you would never know what privilege you lack. Would this work: wp_db = siteĬonfig.vm.synced_folder "./db", "/var/lib/mysql/#.ORA-01031: Insufficient Privileges means that the current user did not use the right privilege to process the SQL statement. So I was wundering what the file permissions should be of the synced folder? I also tried: config.vm.synced_folder "./db", "/var/lib/mysql/example_wp", u: 'vagrant', g: 'www-data'Īnother question How can I use the database name variable set in group_vars/development in my vagrantfile? env: => default: Creating bind mount from /vagrant-nfs-example to /srv/www/example/currentīut should it also be binded like the site_path?īecause when I go to /wp/wp-admin/ I get the Wordpress installation screen which shouldn’t happen and in the next step I get loads of errors saying: WordPress database error: => default: Creating bind mounts for selected devices When running vagrant up the folder seems to be mounted correctly: => default: Mounting NFS shared folders.ĭefault: /vagrant =>~/Dropbox/Websites/example/ansibleĭefault: /var/lib/mysql/example_wp => ~/Dropbox/Websites/example/db ![]() I read up on the Synced Folders option in Vagrant and tried adding the following line to my Vagrantfile: config.vm.synced_folder "./db", "/var/lib/mysql/example_wp", owner: "root", group: "root"Īnd added the folder db in my main project folder. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |